Sign in or 

The first amendment says we shouldn’t discriminate against any group on the basis of religion. It’s a nice theory. But the truth is the law is rarely applied to protect the Christian faith because being in the majority; well I guess we feel they can take it. And if the religion is too far out there, Christian Scientists sure, Scientologists maybe. Wiccans? Well. At what point does a religion become silly enough that it’s okay to make fun of them? And who decides? What this case is really about is tolerance. Whether it’s Hindus attacking Jews, or Muslims against Catholics, Christians fighting with Wiccans. The aim of the law is tolerance. And I could be wrong but I don’t think we ever ratified persecution under the heading of fun. Let me read you something by Martin Niemoler, a German pastor who opposed the Nazis: 'In Germany they came first for the communists and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a communist. Then they came for the Jews and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionist and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Protestant. Then they came for me and by that time there was no one left to speak up.'"
|
Sue_B |
Latest page update: made by Sue_B
, Nov 15 2006, 6:34 PM EST
(about this update
About This Update
view changes - complete history) |
|
More Info: links to this page
|