Welcome! Wikis are websites that everyone can build together. It's easy!

Case 3x12.1

The Peanut Allergy Case


Episode: 3x12 [Nuts]
Client: Helen Choi
Case: The client was sued for the wrongful death of a student in her class who had died from an allergic reaction to peanuts.
CP&S Representation: Shirley Schmidt and Vanessa Walker
Opposing Counsel: Attorney Susan Bixby
Presiding: Judge Gordon Kolodny
Result: The jury found in favor of the defendant.
Notes:
  • Shirley's closing argument:

"Lawsuits are about allocating burden. For example, we want our cars to
be safer, so we hit the manufacturers with a judgment that makes it more cost-effective to install the airbag. The problem here, as Ms. Bixby correctly states, is we have more and more special needs kids going into our public schools, combined with an unprecedented escalation in auto-immune diseases, autism - the peanut allergy alone has doubled in recent years.

"So, who do we heap this responsibility on? Who else? The teachers. The average annual starting salary for a teacher is $32,000. For that, we ask them to teach, police, provide emotional and social guidance - at some schools, they actually have to clean the toilets. Now, let's throw in healthcare.

"This teacher - she works 65-hour weeks. In addition to her actual classroom duties, she teaches sex education to the older kids, she teaches a standardized test the school mandates in order to qualify for funding under the No Child Left Behind Act. She spends another ten hours a month meeting with parents. She supervises extra-curricular activities, goes on overnight class trips, cleans and disinfects toys, coaches. She teaches fire drill safety procedures, healthy eating habits, she's certified in CPR, first aid, and food sanitation.


"She's so overextended that when her own father had to undergo a life-threatening medical procedure, she couldn't be at the hospital. So she called on her cell phone to see if he had lived. Which he hadn't. She then turned away from her students, so as not to traumatize them with her grief, which as a teacher she was expected to internalize.


"She has no savings ... no house
. And today she's being sued because, without her knowledge, one of her students snuck a bite-sized candy bar containing traces of peanut into her classroom. Now she's being publicly blamed for the death of a child whose parents had the means to implement a multitude of safeguards. They implemented none of them except - a teacher.

"Is it any wonder half our teachers are quitting the profession outright within five years? Never mind who's going to handle the epi pen. Who's going to teach?"


Latest page update: made by bloz , Jan 19 2007, 8:27 AM EST (about this update About This Update bloz Edited by bloz

1 word added
1 word deleted

view changes

- complete history)
Keyword tags: None
More Info: links to this page

Anonymous  (Get credit for your thread)


Started By Thread Subject Replies Last Post
GALAXY14 THANKS! 0 Jan 20 2007, 11:07 PM EST by GALAXY14
Thread started: Jan 20 2007, 11:07 PM EST  Watch
I am a special education teacher who was very impressed with the closing argument of Shirley Schmidt during episode 12 of this season. In my search for a transcript or video clip, I discovered that the Boston Legal website at NBC.com is pretty weak. Thank you for posting this outstanding piece of oration. As a 20+year veteran, this script accurately describes my feelings of the current state of teaching in public schools.
5  out of 6 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: None
Top Contributors